Logo-tinubu-Color

$2.5B in Surety Claim-Related Costs.


Yet Still Running on Workarounds.

Why Surety claims complexity outpaces traditional claims systems.

“ 2

“The Surety evaluates multiple routes - deny, pay, finance, tender, complete,settle. Each routetriggers differentdocumentation, approvals, and downstream obligations, which expands work effort and increases handling and legal cost.”

 

ahmad-khan-portrait-circle

Ahmad Khan, Senior Analyst at Research Firm Everest Group

” 2

Surety Claims Are Structurally Unique

  • Three-party obligations, not two-party losses

  • Long-running, judgment-driven investigations
  • Legal, financial, and project oversight intertwined

Yet most Surety claims are still managed in systems designed for auto and property insurance.

High Financial Exposure.
Limited System Support.

Manual workflows, fragmented data, and system workarounds add risk, delay, and cost at every stage.

 

  • US$10.5B U.S. Surety market

  • ~US$2B in annual claim costs
  • Up to ~US$2.5B including handling and legal

Generic claims platforms struggle to support:

  • Indemnity and bond structures
  • Pre-claim investigation workflows
  • Multi-party coordination
  • Takeover and recovery processes
  • Integrated underwriting visibility

What You'll Learn


  • Why legacy systems fall short
  • The operational risks carriers underestimate
  • What purpose-built Surety claims software must include
  • How automation improves control, visibility, and confidence

Get the full analysis and expert insights.

Cover image of